Ok! Let’s get back to something that’s vaguely related to Content, shall we?…
The presentation by Lawrence Lessig mentioned in the update to my Right to Index/Search post is provided through a relatively new video service, YouTube.
YouTube is like Flickr with video… tag, blog, and link to your multimedia.
Which raises the question: why isn’t YouTube Flickr? That is, what is it about multimedia that Flickr didn’t get and so missed this market? Did becoming a Yahoo! company remove the creative urge?
-pmh





May 5th, 2007 at 4:05 pm
The one word answer to your question is “bandwidth”. Being Youtube is harder and more expensive than being Flickr for that reason. And the revenue is the same – nothing. At least Flickr loses less!