<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube = Flickr + motion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theportableconsultant.com/blog/2006/01/18/youtube-flickr-motion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theportableconsultant.com/blog/2006/01/18/youtube-flickr-motion/</link>
	<description>ECM infrastructure architecture... and unrelated matters.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seun Osewa</title>
		<link>http://theportableconsultant.com/blog/2006/01/18/youtube-flickr-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Seun Osewa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 20:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theportableconsultant.com/blog/?p=25#comment-815</guid>
		<description>The one word answer to your question is &quot;bandwidth&quot;.  Being Youtube is harder and more expensive than being Flickr for that reason.  And the revenue is the same - nothing.  At least Flickr loses less!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one word answer to your question is &#8220;bandwidth&#8221;.  Being Youtube is harder and more expensive than being Flickr for that reason.  And the revenue is the same &#8211; nothing.  At least Flickr loses less!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
